overload
I’ve mentored teens and young adults for more than 25 years now, and part of that role is inextricably linked to education in some form or other. Whether it’s finally helping kids make sense of the quadratic equation, or teaching them new strategies for dealing with conflict, I love the look that comes over kids’ faces when they finally get whatever it is that’s been stumping them up to that point.
(I equally love the feeling of learning a new thing myself and knowing “that look” has crept over my own face, though I’ve never actually seen it … which is good, because that would be weird.)
As you might imagine, over the course of a couple of decades, I’ve worked with an awful lot of kids and covered an awful lot of topics. One especially fun exchange is whenever I get to explain to a kid for the first time how money works. (And mind you, this is often during high school or even early college years.)
I take out a dollar bill and ask, “How much is this worth?” And they generally say, “A dollar.” And I reply, “Nope. It’s worth basically nothing.”
Mouths quirk in a mix of confusion and curiosity. It’s clear that I’ve got their attention.
I then take out my checkbook and show them a blank check. “How much is this worth?” They generally try to guess the “right” answer at this point. “Nothing?” they’ll ask more than state.
“Yes, that’s right. Nothing. But what if I write it out for one hundred dollars? Then how much is it worth?”
“A hundred dollars?” they suggest, still unsure.
“Nope. It’s still worth nothing. It’s just paper with printing on it, and now some of my handwriting. It’s worth nothing.”
Here’s where I really get them.
“Hold the dollar up to the check. What do you notice?” I ask, handing them the money and the checkbook.
First, they’ll look for words or numbers that match. Not finding any, the realization I was after soon dawns on nearly everyone: “They’re the same size.”
“Yup. Do you think that’s coincidence?”
They’re really thinking now.
To sum up, I explain that cash is just a check from the government — a promissory note, just like my own checks. It’s just that each bill denomination is written out ahead of time for a specific amount. But it’s all worthless. The only worth each has lies in the assumed trust that, if called in, I can eventually trade those promissory notes for precious metals. And therefore (theoretically, at least) there must be enough precious metals stored somewhere — gold, silver, platinum — to back those worthless pieces of paper.
However, even in my lifetime, this has changed. In truth, our paper money and coins and checks are actually worthless, given value only by mutual consent:
“The entire modern world operates with ‘fiat currency’ as the medium of exchange. The term ‘fiat currency’ refers to the notion that money is money because the government says it is. However, while the government sets the value of paper money and coins, the system would not work without the consent of the public. If the public stops believing that money has value, they will stop using it, and the whole system will collapse.”1
Wide-eyed wonder (and something akin to fear) usually follow.
Of interest, we’re now seeing the emergence of cryptocurrency (e.g., Bitcoin), as people realize that government-issued paper and coins do have only the value we give to them.
All that is to say that we’re two shakes of a lamb’s tail from being back to trading clam shells as currency.
What’s certain is that the more of something there is in play, the less it’s actually worth.
*****
I’m going somewhere with all of this, I promise. But lest anyone feel they are falling down the rabbit hole over the money situation, let me bring it all back to something a little cozier.
I wrote a recent post after having seen Disney’s new live-action version of Beauty and the Beast (now for the third time). In the opening montage, Belle enters the closest thing to a library in her “little town.” It appears to be a chapel of some sort. There is a small wooden table upon which perhaps a dozen leather-bound books stand in a neat row. Belle returns the book she’s been reading (Romeo and Juliet per her quote about “two lovers in fair Verona”) and chooses another. It’s made clear that she’s read them all time and time again. And yet, because of their scarcity, they remain precious to her.
Later, in the Beast’s castle, as he lies recuperating from a wolf attack, he wakes to find Belle quoting from Romeo and Juliet.
“Blecht!” he blurts, following derisively with “Why am I not surprised?” He then makes the assertion that there are so many better books to read.
After a short walk down a corridor, enormous wooden doors creak open … and Belle is ushered into a vast and elaborate library containing a dizzying number of books, stacked floor to 40-foot ceiling. After recovering from her initial shock and speechlessness, Belle exclaims, “It’s wonderful!”
Beast looks around, with a blasé shoulder roll, unimpressed. “If you like it so much, it’s yours.”
How is it that Belle’s little corner table of 10 or 12 books was so precious to her … and yet the Beast’s seemingly endless library had lost all value to him, to the point where he’d give it all away without a second thought?
Overload.
Too much of a good thing.
The more of something there is in play, the less it’s actually worth.
*****
Consider how this might apply to the perpetual and inexhaustible source of information now available thanks to the Internet. I don’t think that calling it “miraculous” would be overstating things.
There are those who will decry the “ever present evils” afforded to modern society due to technology. I’m not one of them. In fact, for the time being, I’m talking about all of the good and helpful offerings.
Insightful blogs.
Uplifting podcasts.
Videos capturing remarkable people doing inspiring things.
Byte-sized motivation.
A rushing river of wisdom and encouragement, available to all, around the clock.
I myself contribute to this flow as an author and blogger. I believe it makes a difference.
And yet lately, I’ve found myself keenly aware of just how easy it’s become, as such positivity proliferates, to see it, read it, feel momentarily stirred, click “Like” or “Share” … and then move on, without its ever really making a difference to how we live.
It wasn’t always this way. Like Belle with her tiny assortment of available reading choices, wisdom was something you came by only ever so often. You’d borrow a title from the library, and some tidbit would stand out. Or you’d get a card in the mail with an inspirational quote, and you’d stick it to the fridge for a while with a magnet.
The glut is a relatively new phenomenon. I think we’ve all felt at times a negativity overload. But I really do believe there’s also such a thing as a positivity overload — where none of it really sinks in anymore.
What’s to be done about it? How do we go about restoring value and weight to wisdom in our lives, in a way that changes us rather than merely blurring past us at light speed?
I do believe we can.
What would it take?
Images of Greek scholars sitting on marble steps. Rodin’s The Thinker. They depict scenes that seem purely historical. But despite modern tendencies to embrace fads, some things that worked thousands of years ago — still work just as well today:
Intention.
And that doesn’t require the seclusion of some monastery or Zen garden.
Here’s a challenge to you.
Today or tomorrow, after you hit “Like” on what seems a meaningful meme or quote, take 10 seconds and write it down. Then place it somewhere you’re likely to see it many times over the course of the next few days.
Or fold it up and put it in your pocket. Then every time you feel it in there during the day, or when you remove it at night, take just a few minutes and consider it. (This is really the basis of what some call “meditation.”)
Another variation I often use is sending the quote to myself as a text message, and then opening it. That little red bubble does wonders by way of reminding me to think about what I’ve sent.
But don’t just think about what it means. Think about what it means to you.
What changes or choices might it require of you, if you were to put that piece of advice or wisdom into practice? When might be the next time you could put some feet to that?
How does it encourage you toward a specific goal you’ve set?
You could even jot down on your piece of paper, or in your phone’s Notes app, anything that occurs to you.
And don’t keep it to yourself. Share your thoughts with a coworker, your spouse, your son or a friend. Imagine how that might change an otherwise predictable dinner conversation.
With just a little extra effort, we can each restore a sense of significance and value to what might otherwise be just another blip of data whizzing by at light speed on the information superhighway.
I’m with you on this one, Erik. The internet is a veritable treasure-trove of shared learning on all levels, in spite of the ease of access and inevitable errors…often the opinion, rather than the facts of another’s experience. We do gloss over much that could have value, having reached a saturation point that allows us to be heedless.
My son always takes note of the inspirational phrases that resonate with him. I am still old-fashioned enough to draw inspiration from the written word too: I think that is because as a writer myself, I am acutely aware that it is a person who wrote the words, drawing them from experience and sharing them as I hope we could over coffee were we to meet.
Just as money is a symbol for the agreed value of expended energy, the words on a page are symbols of a deeper understanding.
Yes, I suppose I (we) are old fashioned; but as wonderful as technology is, and as much as it allows us to do, I’ll always prefer a printed book over a digital representation. This post got me thinking that perhaps it’s in part due to the fact that, at least for me, buying a new book was an event — something I saved up for — so I had to choose wisely. And what I read stood out more. I still kind of feel that way.
And I agree that “words on a page” are, in a way, a kind of currency of meaning. Well put.
Books have always held magic for me…I still get that feeling of excitement, even now. Every book was ‘Christmas’… and I still have most of them, returning and re-reading, finding new meaning as I find new understanding of life, every time. That is one of the reasons why paper will always be better than a screen for me.
“Every book was ‘Christmas.'” Perfect way to put it.
For me, every book feels like a new vacation. 🙂
I’ve seen far more Christmases than vacations 😉
I thought at first you were going to recommend going technology free for a couple hours each day, or a day a week, etc. I agree that information overload dulls our appreciation of information, even the positive. It seems, in a way, that your suggestion to savor a slice of meaningful data, and my thought about technology time outs, both speak to slowing down, noticing, and appreciating. I know that after a busy day on the computer, I’m craving that slow time to breathe and think, simply to linger and be.
You’re right that the overload of information becomes a rushing stream through the brain, and though sparkling and lovely, it would be nice to have a few pools of calm water along the way to notice the trees, listen to the birds and contemplate the journey – places to become immersed and let the mind relax. Every day, I read wonderful quotes and enlightening or creative posts that slip in and slip out as I hurry on to the next data bit. There are some that give me “aha” moments, and I say to myself, “I have to remember that.” And I don’t. I love your suggestion to jot one down and give it some meditative time (during my technology time out!). Ha ha.
Thanks for another opportunity to reflect, Erik. BTW, I’m planning to reblog your influence post tomorrow. 🙂 Should be a fun (and another busy) day! <3
I honestly have never been able to figure out your seemingly ubiquitous presence in the blogosphere, Diana! It almost seems you have a team of elves handling it for you. 😉 And you not only read them all, you engage. It’s wonderful, really. Community is so important. And yet still, we do need those “quiet pools.” Balance is hard to find. There is always “one more” … something we could get to. And, like you, if I’m not careful, I find myself thinking “I have to remember that” … and then forgetting to remember. (I write most of my posts to myself; and it’s great if someone else gets something from them as well.)
Glad the “Influence” post will see a revival. I hope it draws the net on some more readers for your fantastic story!
I wish I had a team of elves! They’d come in handy. I was just talking with another blogger about balance and we decided that it doesn’t exist for more than a few moments of hours. The moment you land on it, the ball starts rolling again. Making moments to reflect on the bits of wisdom or joy or or beauty or poignancy that we find out here in the virtual world helps maintain perspective at least. We can stop by and soak in a few pools on our way down the cyber stream. 🙂
Maybe the balance isn’t some middle ground, but finding time for both riding the current and sitting by the pools. In other words, maybe balance isn’t finding a moderate pace, but learning to have some each of rushing and stopping.
I think you may be right. There are times when I can glide, be totally in the present and read or garden or play without anywhere to be. And then back on the clock and taking care of business (whatever that may be).
When I worked with little kids, I would train parents and preschool teachers on children’s stress and how stress overload could be activated by “good” things as well as “bad.” So the kid that gets overwhelmed by his birthday party and has a meltdown makes sense. Too much good stress. The virtual world moves so fast, I think overloading is easy. I see it in bloggers sometimes who just need to back off for a while. I’m glad they honor that need; it’s healthy. 🙂
I myself have been there, and taken that time away because I needed to refill. My problem (as yours, I’m sure) is that I want to do and be too many things!
Yup. 😀
Seriously, Erik — every blog I visit, Diana’s already been there and left a thoughtful comment! It took me over a week just to fill out the Mother’s Day card that’s been sitting on the edge of my desk!
… and yet you’re still early for Mother’s Day. Be your own yardstick (because Diana is an impossible one). 😉
Great post, Erik.
First up: With respect to your opening salvo, you know I’ve spent a lot of time on my blog exploring the ideas in media theorist Douglas Rushkoff’s book Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now. But he followed that up with a thought-provoking economic treatise called Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus: How Growth Became the Enemy of Prosperity in which he argues that our economy is far from the fixed, God-given absolute it is generally recognized to be (by economists and otherwise), but rather a manmade operating system that needs to be reprogrammed from its outmoded Industrial Age protocols to serve a new era of what he calls digital distributionism — i.e., an economy in which value is created (and/or exchanged) through the constant circulation of revenue versus the extraction of finite resources, which, economically, socially, and environmentally, has reached its outer limits, if not its outright breaking point. He makes the case for an economy that stops encouraging the hoarding of wealth through monopolistic corporate platforms (like Amazon) and instead facilitates the rapid flow of it through direct peer-to-peer exchange (such as Etsy). Basically, he makes an appeal for sustainability over growth. I bring this up only because you may find it of interest.
On the subject of information overload (have you ever heard Extreme’s song “Comfortably Dumb”?), I’ve made a conscious effort lately to take in less information (which includes all forms of media), but to try to absorb what I do read/watch more deeply. For instance, I’ve gotten into the habit, after I read a book, of writing a lengthy review of it on Goodreads before I simply toss it aside and move on to the next one in the pile — to think about what it means, and, as you advise, what it means to me. Information in any form, not merely feel-good aphorisms, isn’t something that’s meant to be experienced passively — to blow over us like the wind — but to be internalized, and emotionally/intellectually processed. We’ve talked before about that scene in Smoke where William Hurt is just flipping mindlessly through Harvey Keitel’s photo album, and Keitel tells him, “You’ll never get it if you don’t slow down, my friend.” Modern technology encourages consumption, not contemplation, but maybe we ought to ask ourselves what any of it is worth, and, as you assert, see if we can’t restore value to the embarrassment of media riches we’re all inundated with these days.
Hey, Sean. I’m glad I still make it in under the wire on the “less information” rule. 🙂
I hadn’t thought of it, but writing a review certainly does make one stop and consider what’s been read. Thanks for introducing that to others.
I also think (perhaps ironically) that “consumption vs. contemplation” is a memorable aphorism … or can be. (I’ll write it down.)
As for the currency chat, it’s mind boggling. I think, just as in the days of the Vanderbilts and Rockerfellers, “big money” will try to hold onto the system, however illusory, as long as possible. I wonder what changes will occur in our own lifetime.
I’m brand new here, but think this will be a great addition to my regular blog reading routine. I absolutely agree that we have finely honed our abilities to skim data. While this allows us to process more, and more quickly, we risk losing the value and meaning of what we are processing.
Slowing down, paying attention, and making an effort to retain will likely help. However, it’s gonna be a challenge to break habits that are so strongly reinforces within society.
Hi, Gabe. Welcome. Thanks for dropping by; I hope you’ll stick around.
You’ll quickly find that most of what I write about comes back to one central idea: “You always have a choice.” We don’t have a choice about everything in life, in the sense of having control over every choice we wish we had available; but we do get to choose what we do with whatever we’re handed. We get to choose what we do next. In this case, we didn’t choose the society or time into which we were born. But we do get to decide how much we let in, and when. You’re right though … it can be a challenge.
I think I read somewhere that you are a hiker and world traveler. So you know a thing or two about overcoming challenges.
I got that look on my face — did you see it? I’ve been around a while – a lot longer than a young adult, and I never ever figured out that a dollar bill (or a $10 or a $20 bill, etc.) is the same size as my checks. How’d I go all this time without realizing that? Hmmm, because I never took the time to really think about what that bill or check signified. I just used it, as taught.
But regarding books and blogs and quotes, etc. (and I love the fact that you’ve seen B and the B three times – I loved it that much too), I DO save sayings/quotes that are meaningful to me. Luckily for me, I teach creative writing to adults, so they get to hear me wax poetic about the latest wonderful saying I’ve read from a book or blog. Most of my students/friends are not blog readers (and I think many people think it’s a waste of time). But there are so many ‘out there’ sharing their souls with their blogging words. And I may never meet those people, but I learn from them. And I also have a greater faith in the human race because of what they share.
Isn’t it fun to keep learning new things, Pam? I actually pursue that goal (and “that look on my face” that accompanies it) — a true lifelong learner. Glad I could share a memorable tidbit.
And I am extra glad to know that you’re getting the opportunity to teach creative writing. You’re teaching adults an important and very real skill in a way that I know makes it un-scary and lots of fun. To learn and to teach simultaneously is the best combination.
And I share your final sentiment in how our blogging communities can instill greater faith in the human race and the good that exists in the world, rather than focusing on the negative.